Call for Papers

We are pleased to invite submissions for papers to the 2025 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). We encourage all submissions that address one of our five contribution areas: Critical Computing and Design Theory, Design Methods and Processes, Artifacts and Systems, Research Through Design, and AI and Design. 

Important Dates

Submission Site opens3 January 2025
Title and Abstract deadline13 January 2025 
Paper and Pictorial Submission deadline20 January 2025 
Notifications8 April 2025
Camera-Ready Completion Deadline22 April 2025
DIS 2025 Conference5-9 of July 2025

Deadlines specified as Anywhere on Earth time

DIS 2025 will be an in-person-only event, and authors must present their work in person. Presenting online or with a video will not be possible. Accepted papers whose authors do not present may have their paper withdrawn from the ACM Digital Library. We encourage you to ensure you can make it to Funchal between the 5th and 9th of July 2025 before you submit to DIS’25. 

Conference Theme

In a time of unprecedented global change, DIS 2025 focuses on designing for sustainability, urging us to rethink our relationship with the planet and its environments and oceans. As designers and researchers, we face the challenges of navigating through these uncertain times, but the inherent disruption the coming changes entail also offers us an opportunity to recalibrate and retarget our approaches toward achieving a more sustainable future. Leaning into these ideas, the theme of DIS 2025 encourages us to explore alternative approaches that move beyond human-centered design, emphasizing the importance of ecological systems and our interconnectedness with all forms of life. By rethinking the boundaries between humans, non-humans, technology, and nature, we aim to contribute to a more sustainable and symbiotic future.

DIS’25 welcomes work addressing the design of interactive systems in the broadest possible sense. In addition, we particularly encourage submissions that address the DIS’25 conference theme.

Contribution Areas

DIS 2025 includes the following five contribution areas for submissions: Critical Computing and Design Theory, Design Methods and Processes, Artifacts and Systems, Research Through Design, and AI and Design. We particularly encourage submissions that address one of these five contribution areas, each described in further detail below: 

Critical Computing and Design Theory

This area invites papers on the topics of critical computing, design theory and their overlap. Critical computing encompasses the reimagination as well as analysis and critique of technologies in the world—i.e., the political, ethical, and moral dimensions of computing and the interactive systems we create. Design theory encompasses knowledge around critical-reflective design and research practice. We welcome epistemologically pluralistic approaches, spanning disciplines, theories, and methods, including those that question or confront technological progress. The area seeks papers that explore and expand the relationships among design inquiry, politics, aesthetics, ethics, pragmatism, and craftsmanship.

Design Methods and Processes

This area invites papers that document, innovate, and advance the methods, approaches, and processes used in interaction design, UX design, and service design across industry, academia, and the public sector. We are particularly interested in methodological contributions that push the boundaries of current practice, exploring new scales, audiences, and contexts for design. This includes innovative methods that enable designers to address complex, multi-layered problems, engage with underrepresented or hard-to-reach communities, and adapt to diverse, evolving technological landscapes.

Artifacts and Systems

This area invites papers that analyze, evaluate, and/or reflect on artifacts and interactive systems across a wide range of materials, fabrication methods, and technologies. We encourage papers that expand our understanding of meaningful interactions (including but not limited to sensing and actuation) and how they can be designed to support more sustainable, equitable, and resilient outcomes. We especially call for projects that engage with the experience of the material, temporal, and spatial aspects of designing objects, systems, and spaces.

Research Through Design (RtD)

The RtD area invites research that presents contributions resulting from the exploration of design practices, materials, artifacts, technologies, and interfaces. Core to this area is an iterative, hands-on engagement, where design probes act as lenses for uncovering new insights and implications in a wide variety of design research processes.

AI and Design

This area invites papers that make a design contribution to artificial intelligence. We hope to receive papers on design for AI (making AI things), design with AI (using AI to help or automate design), design of agents and robots (such as their social presence), responsible AI, and design AI and its regulations. Contributions may include resources, methods, and tools for design; AI artifacts and systems; first-person experiences of designing with or for AI; conceptual frameworks for combining design knowledge and AI; empirical studies with a sensitivity for human needs and AI capabilities. Many papers that authors consider submitting to this subcommittee will also be a match to one of the other subcommittees. As a guide, we suggest you submit papers to this subcommittee when the paper makes an equal contribution to Design and to AI or in cases where reviewers need a deep background in both design and AI.

Special Note on Broader Impact

At DIS 2025, all submissions will be assessed based on their broader impact on society and/or the environment. We encourage authors to address the positive and negative, actual and potential, and/or pragmatic significance of their work; that is, they should engage in substantive and reflective discussions of the impact of their research beyond a narrow intellectual contribution to the field.

Preparing Your Submissions

Please submit papers through the Precision Conference Submission Portal

As part of the submission process, authors must submit an abstract, keywords, author list, and meta-data related to the submission’s contents by 13th January 2025. Authors will also be asked to select a ranked list of between one and two contribution areas that fit their submitted paper. This content will be used to assign your paper to one of the subcommittees. It is not necessarily the case that your submission will be handled by a subcommittee that aligns with the contribution area you choose as a first preference. You can change the title and abstract as often as you like before the final submission deadline on 20 January 2025, but the author list and order must remain unchanged. 


Please ensure that you and your co-authors obtain an ORCID ID, so you can complete the publishing process for your accepted paper.  ACM has been involved in ORCID from the start and has recently made a commitment to collect ORCID IDs from all their published authors. ACM is committed to improving author discoverability, ensuring proper attribution and contributing to ongoing community efforts around name normalization; your ORCID ID will help in these efforts.

Paper length and format

Papers do not have a page limit. Authors are instead encouraged to submit a paper with a length proportional to its contribution. The length of typical submissions is expected to be approximately 7,000–8,000 words excluding references, figure/table captions, and appendices. Submissions above 12,000 words or below 4,000 words will be considered for desk rejection. Papers whose lengths are incommensurate with their contributions will be rejected. Papers should be succinct but thorough in presenting the work. Papers may be perceived as too long if they are repetitive or verbose, too short if they omit important details, neglect relevant prior art, or tamper with formatting rules to save on page count.

It is important that your submission is formatted correctly. Incorrectly formatted submissions might be rejected. Full online guidance is available from the ACM: https://www.acm.org/publications/authors/submissions 

Templates are available for several platforms: 

First, authors prepare their manuscript in the designated single-column format in PDF using LaTeX or Microsoft Word. LaTeX users should use \documentclass[manuscript, review]{acmart}. For an anonymous submission, use \documentclass[manuscript,review,anonymous]{acmart} to automatically replace the authors for “ANONYMOUS AUTHOR(S)”. The authors then submit the PDF via PCS. Reviewers will review the papers in the single-column format. 

Upon conditional acceptance of an article, authors revise the manuscript and submit publication-ready source files to PCS. The ACM workflow requests authors to produce final publications (PDF and HTML5) by themselves using TAPS: https://authors.acm.org/proceedings/production-information/taps-production-workflow

Paper Examples

If you are unsure of what constitutes a well-formed paper, see examples in the ACM Digital Library, including award-winning papers from recent years:

Sjoerd Hendriks, Mafalda Gamboa, and Mohammad Obaid. 2024. The Undertable: A Design Remake of the Mediated Body. [https://doi.org/10.1145/3643834.3660698

Caitlin Lustig, Maya A Kaneko, Meghna Gupta, Kavita Dattani, Audrey Desjardins, and Daniela Rosner. 2024. Porous by Design: How Childcare Platforms Impact Worker Personhood, Safety, and Connection. [https://doi.org/10.1145/3643834.3661552

Tomas Lawton, Kazjon Grace, and Francisco J Ibarrola. 2023. When is a Tool a Tool? User Perceptions of System Agency in Human–AI Co-Creative Drawing. [https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/ 10.1145/3563657.3595977]   

Alexandra To, Angela D. R. Smith, Dilruba Showkat, Adinawa Adjagbodjou, and Christina Harrington. 2023. Flourishing in the Everyday: Moving Beyond Damage-Centered Design in HCI for BIPOC Communities. [https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3596057]

Creating an Accessible ACM Conference Submission

ACM publications are reviewed and read by many people. Making your paper accessible will help to promote the equal participation of people with disabilities. This section describes how to check if your PDF is accessible and how to fix the most common accessibility problems. For more information please refer to Adobe’s accessibility resource center.

How do I test if my PDF is accessible?

The document should be tagged. In Adobe Acrobat Pro: Go to the ‘File’ menu. ‘Document properties’. ‘Description’ tab. Look for ‘Tagged PDF: Yes’ among the set of advanced properties. If you do not have access to Adobe Acrobat, try selecting some text in the PDF and pasting it into a text editor. If you can’t do this, or the text looks wrong, chances are your document is not readable with a screen reader.

Check the accessibility. In Adobe Acrobat Pro: Go to the ‘Advanced’ menu. ‘Accessibility’. ‘Full Check’. The checker will report accessibility problems.

Fonts should be embedded, or your PDF will need to be regenerated, and you may lose the accessibility that you have added. In Adobe Acrobat Pro: Go to the ‘File’ menu. ‘Document properties’. ‘Fonts’ tab. All of the fonts should have the word ’embedded’ in parentheses after the font name (unless they are not visible in the final document).

How do I fix accessibility problems?

Word users should correct as many problems as possible in the Word source file rather than the PDF, as described in the next section. On a PC, the Adobe plugin for Word can export accessibility features from the Word document into the PDF.

On a Mac, this is not the case. Those using Word on a Mac, and all LaTeX users will need to edit the PDF directly using Adobe Acrobat. A better basic PDF may be produced by using latex2pdf as opposed to ps2pdf. See also the WebAim PDF Accessibility primer [http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/resources.html], which provides information for OpenOffice users.

The accessibility checker in Adobe Acrobat Pro provides help with fixing many accessibility problems. The following steps are for Adobe Acrobat Pro 9. For more detailed instructions for Adobe Acrobat Pro XI see the Accessible PDF guidelines. You can also find more information on Adobe’s accessibility resources page

  • Add tags. Go to the ‘Advanced’ menu. Select ‘Accessibility’, then ‘Add tags to document’.
  • Add alternative text for figures. Context-click the Figure, select ‘Properties’, and fill in ‘Alternate Text’. If no ‘Properties’ option appears, go to the ‘Advanced’ menu, select ‘Touch Up Reading Order’, and then try context-clicking on the figures again, looking for an ‘Edit alternate text’ option.
  • Specify the document language. Go to the ‘File’ menu. Select ‘Properties’, then the ‘Advanced’ tab, ‘Language’ field. In some versions of Acrobat, the ‘Properties’ option is called ‘Document Properties’. In some versions, the ‘Language’ field is in a ‘Reading Options’ tab.
  • Define tab order.
    • Go to the ‘View’ menu. Select ‘Navigation tabs’, then ‘Pages’.
    • Click on any page, then type Ctrl-A (or Command-A on a Mac) to select all the pages.
    • Go to the ‘Options’ menu in the top right of the dialogue box (icon showing two cogs), and select ‘Page Properties’.
    • In the ‘Tab Order’ tab, select ‘Use document structure’.
  • Make sure tables have headings.
    • Go to the ‘View’ menu. Select ‘Navigation tabs’, then ‘Tags’.
    • Select the ‘Tags’ tab. This panel shows the document structure as a tree.
    • Navigate to the table cells that should be headers.
    • Check they have the type <TH>. If not, then right-click on the header cell, select ‘properties’, select the ‘Tag’ tab, and change the value for ‘Type’ to ‘Table Header Cell’.

Creating an accessible PDF directly from Word

The following link provides step-by-step instructions for adding basic accessibility information to a Word document on a PC, then exporting it to a PDF document intended for ACM: Create an accessible ACM submission using Microsoft Word

These guidelines were adopted from ASSETS 2020.

Policies

By submitting your article to an ACM Publication, you are hereby acknowledging that you and your co-authors are subject to all ACM Publications Policies, including ACM’s new Publications Policy on Research Involving Human Participants and Subjects. Alleged violations of this policy or any ACM Publications Policy will be investigated by ACM and may result in a full retraction of your paper, in addition to other potential penalties, as per ACM Publications Policy.

Anonymization Policy

All submissions must be anonymized for review. Author and affiliation sections and credits must be left blank. Authors of accepted submissions will add this information in preparation of the “camera-ready” version. We are using the ACM CHI Anonymization Policy of reviewing. We use a relaxed model that does not attempt to conceal all traces of identity from the body of the paper.

Authors are expected to remove author and institutional identities from the title and header areas, as noted in the submission instructions (Note: changing the text color of the author information is not sufficient). Make sure that no description that can easily reveal authors’ names and/or affiliations is included in the submission (e.g., too detailed descriptions of where user studies were conducted). Authors should also remove any information in the acknowledgments section that reveals the authors or the institution (e.g., specific supporting grant information). Also, please make sure that identifying information does not appear in the document’s meta-data (e.g., the ‘Authors’ field in your word processor’s ‘Save As’ dialog box). In addition, we require that the acknowledgments section be left blank as it could also easily identify the authors and/or their institution.

Further suppression of identity in the body of the submission is left to the authors’ discretion. Authors must leave citations to their previous work unanonymized so that reviewers can ensure that all previous research has been taken into account by the authors. However, authors are required to cite their own work in the third person, e.g., avoid “As described in our previous work [10], … ” and use instead “As described by Jones et al. [10], …”

Policy on Use of Large Language Models

Text generated from a large-scale language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, must be clearly marked where such tools are used for purposes beyond editing the author’s own text. Please carefully review the April 2023 ACM Policy on Authorship before you use these tools. The SIGCHI blog post describes approaches to acknowledging the use of such tools and we refer to it for guidance. Note that the LaTeX template will default to hiding the Acknowledgements section while in review mode – please make sure that any LLM disclosure is available in your submitted version. While we do not anticipate using tools on a large scale to detect LLM-generated text, we will investigate submissions brought to our attention and desk-reject papers where LLM use is not clearly marked.

Policy on Research Involving Human Participants and Subjects

Any research in submitted manuscripts that involves human subjects must go through the appropriate ethics review requirements that apply to the authors’ research environment. As research environments vary considerably with regard to their requirements, authors are asked to submit a short note to reviewers that provides this context. Please also see the 2021 ACM Publications policy on research involving humans before submitting.

Review Process

After the submission deadline, each paper will be assigned to a split committee during the PCS submission process in consultation with SCs, and at the discretion of the technical program chairs. The DIS 2025 paper committees will be composed of Associate Chairs that collectively represent expertise across all contribution types. The process will be similar to the DIS 2024 conference and is intended to foster discussion across contribution types and also ensure equitable workload across ACs.

SCs will then assign each paper to a primary AC (1AC) and a secondary AC (2AC). The 1AC will find two external reviewers. Each external reviewer and the 2AC (who will be blind wrt the authors’ identity) will each write a detailed review of their assigned submissions and assess the contribution of the research to the field. Thus, each paper will receive 3 detailed reviews. As part of this process, we will strive to find ACs and reviewers who are experts in the topic area of each submission. We also highly encourage all authors to sign up and volunteer to be reviewers.

After the reviews have been written, the 1AC for a paper will examine the paper and review content, trigger discussions among the review panel if required, and write a meta-review of the paper that summarizes the three submitted reviews. If 1ACs disagree with the other reviews, they will be required to write a review as well as a meta-review; we will strive to distinguish between the 1AC’s assessment of the submission and the summarisation of the other reviews.

The 1AC will present a recommendation for the paper’s acceptance or rejection to the SC responsible for that submission. SCs and ACs will meet at a virtual program committee meeting with the technical program chairs to discuss the final acceptance of papers for inclusion in the program

Accepted papers will be included in the Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems 2025 and will become available in ACM Digital Library.

Upon Acceptance of Your Paper

Authors will be notified of conditional acceptance or rejection of their paper on or before the notification date of 8th April 2025. Meta reviews will describe any further changes that the authors are expected to make to the paper prior to its publication. These should be made as part of a “camera-ready submission” and submitted to PCS by the deadline of 22nd April 2025. Final changes will be checked by members of the program committee prior to making a final acceptance of the paper. If authors are unable to meet the requirements for changes, the program chairs will be notified and may reject the paper.

Accepted authors should ensure they have obtained permission to use licensed content and images that depict identifiable people in their conference contributions (paper/pictorial, videos, and presentations). Responsibility for obtaining permission to use video, audio, or pictures of identifiable people or proprietary content rests with the author, not the ACM or the DIS conference. All accepted submissions require a signed form assigning copyright or license to the ACM, an upfront fee to ACM to enable Open Access, or institutional enrollment in the ACM Open program. More information on rights management can be found here: https://authors.acm.org/. Finally, and as part of this rights management process, presenting authors may be asked to opt-in to and grant permission to record and/or stream their presentations at the conference.

Accepted submissions will also be asked to prepare and submit a short teaser video (approximately one minute) to promote contributions at the conference and to share the work with the broader community.

Additionally, each accepted submission requires a full conference registration fee to be paid unless the person presenting the paper or pictorial is a first-author student, in which case, a student registration fee has to be paid.

All published papers will appear online in the ACM Digital Library and be distributed digitally to conference delegates as part of the conference proceedings.

At the conference, authors of accepted submissions must present their work and be available to answer questions from other conference participants. Presenters of papers will have a presentation slot at the conference of approximately 20 minutes, though this may be altered prior to the conference based on scheduling needs. Information on presentations will be sent by email to the corresponding author. Papers whose authors do not present in any form may be removed from the ACM Digital Library and the conference proceedings.

Questions?

Please direct any questions to the paper chairs using the contact information listed below.

DIS 2025 Program Committee

  • Qian Yang, Cornell University
  • Clement Zheng, National University of Singapore
  • Ian Oakley, KAIST

tpc@dis2025.acm.org


Critical Computing and Design Theory

Subcommittee Chairs

  • Sai Shruthi Chivukula, Pratt Institute
  • Carl DiSalvo, Georgia Institute of Technology

Associate Chairs

  • Ahmed Syed Ishtiaque, University of Toronto, Canada
  • Austin Toombs, Indiana University, USA
  • Dipto Das, University of Toronto, Canada
  • Emily Tseng, Microsoft Research, USA
  • Jaime Synder, University of Washington, USA
  • Johanna Gunawan, Maastricht University, Netherlands
  • John Vines, University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Juan Fernando Maestre, Swansea University, UK
  • Kristina Mah, University of Sydney, Australia
  • Laura Boffi, independent researcher
  • Lorena Sanchez Chamorro, University of Twente, Netherlands
  • Lynn Dombrowski, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
  • Marisol Wong-Villacres, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador
  • Max Krüger, University of Siegen, Germany
  • Milena Radzikowska, Mount Royal University, Canada
  • Nusrat Jahan Min, Harvard University, USA
  • Peter Gall Krogh, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • Renee Shelby, Google Research, USA
  • Ron Wakkary, Simon Fraser University, Canada & Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Rua Williams, Purdue University, USA
  • Safinah Ali, Massachusetts Institute of Technology & New York University, USA
  • Shichao Zhao, Oregon State University, USA
  • Shruti Mahajan, Union College, USA
  • Sumita Sharma, University of Oulu, Finland
  • Tom Jenkins, ITU Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Tram Tran, University of Sydney, Australia
  • Yiying Wu, University of Sydney, Australia

Design Methods and Processes

Subcommittee Chairs

  • Mark Blythe, Northumbria University
  • Carine Lallemand, Eindhoven University of Technology

Associate Chairs

  • Alejandra Gómez Ortega, Stockholm University, Sweden
  • Alma Leora Culén, University of Oslo, Norway
  • Armağan Karahanoğlu, University of Twente, Netherlands
  • Babitha George, Quicksand Design Studio & Northumbria University, UK
  • Charles Windlin, Stockholm University, Sweden
  • Dennis Reidsma, University of Twente, Netherlands
  • Emeline Brulé, University of Sussex, UK
  • Eugene Kukshinov, University of Waterloo, Canada
  • Felix Anand Epp, Aalto University & University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Francesca Toso, University of Twente, Netherlands
  • Hanieh Shakeri, Dalhousie University, Canada
  • Hayoun Noh, University of Oxford, UK
  • Heekyoung Jung, University of Cincinnati, USA
  • Himanshu Verma, TU Delft, Netherlands
  • Jeni Paay, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
  • Jon Rogers, Northumbria University, UK
  • Jonathan Hook, University of York, UK
  • Julien Nelson, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
  • Karen Cochrane, University of Waterloo, Canada
  • Karey Helms, Umeå Institute of Design & Stockholm University, Sweden
  • Lucas M. Silva, University of Iowa, USA
  • Luke Hespanhol, The University of Sydney, Australia
  • Mafalda Samuelsson-Gamboa, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Maliheh Ghajargar, Chapman University, USA
  • Marion Koelle, OFFIS – Institute for Information Technology, Germany
  • Matthew Lee-Smith, Loughborough University, UK
  • Matthias Laschke, University of Siegen, Germany
  • Michaela Honauer, University of Twente, Netherlands & Technical University of Applied Sciences Ohm, Germany
  • Morgan Scheuerman, Sony AI, USA
  • Nathalie Bressa, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France
  • Oscar Tomico, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • Romain Toebosch, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
  • Si Chen, University of Notre Dame, USA
  • Swaroop Panda, Northumbria University, UK
  • Thomas Dylan, Northumbria University, UK
  • Verena Distler, University of Aalto, Finland
  • Youn-kyung Lim, KAIST, Korea

Artifacts and Systems

Subcommittee Chairs

  • Kristina Andersen, Eindhoven University of Technology
  • Sara Nabil, Queen’s University

Associate Chairs

  • Aditya Nittala, University of Calgary, Canada
  • Ahmed Sabbir Arif, University of California, Merced, USA
  • Chris Speed, RMIT University, Australia
  • Dave Kirk, Newcastle University, UK
  • David Chatting, Newcastle University, UK
  • Dina El-Zanfaly, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Dr Paul Tennent, University of Nottingham, UK
  • Eleni Margariti, Newcastle University, UK
  • Feng Feng, IT University Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Fiona Bell, University of New Mexico, USA
  • Gabrielle Benabdallah, University of Washington, USA
  • Harpreet Sareen, The New School, USA
  • Janet Yi-Ching Huang, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Jas Brooks, University of Chicago, USA
  • Jasmine Lu, University of Chicago, USA
  • Jessica Rahman, CSIRO, Australia
  • Jingyi Li, Pomona College, USA
  • Joep Frens, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Jules Françoise, Université Paris-Saclay, France
  • Katherine Song, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Laura Devendorf, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
  • Maria Luce Lupetti, Polytechnic University of Turin, Italy
  • Ofer Berman, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
  • Pete Bennett, University of Bristol, UK
  • Pin-Sung Ku, Cornell, USA
  • Rong-Hao Liang, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Samar Sabie, University of Toronto, Canada
  • Sang Leigh, Cornell University, USA
  • Sarah Delgado Rodriguez, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Germany
  • Sarah Sterman, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
  • Shreyosi Endow, University of Texas, Arlington, USA
  • Verena Fuchsberger, University of Salzburg, Austria
  • William Gaver, Northumbria University, UK

Research Through Design

Subcommittee Chairs

  • Youngwoo Park, UNIST
  • Daniel Saakes, University of Twente

Associate Chairs

  • Anastasia Kouvaras Ostrowski, Purdue University, USA
  • Bart Hengeveld, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Ben Kirman, University of York, UK
  • Bokyung Lee, Yonsei University, Korea
  • Ce Zhong, Arizona State University, USA
  • Daisuke Uriu, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan
  • Dajung Kim, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Korea
  • Daragh Byrne, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Denise Geiskkovitch, McMaster University, Canada
  • Devansh Saxena, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
  • Donghyeon Ko, KAIST, Korea
  • Dr Michael Stead, Lancaster University, UK
  • Emmi Pouta, Aalto University, Finland
  • Giovanni Troiano, Northeastern University, USA
  • Heather Jin Hee Kim, Cornell University, USA
  • Iohanna Nicenboim, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Jesse Josua Benjamin, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Jiwei Zhou, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Jordan Wirfs-Brock, Whitman College, USA
  • Lara Piccolo, Open University, UK
  • Lock, Daniel, University of York, UK
  • Maria Wolters, University of Edinburgh, UK, & OFFIS Institute for Information Technology, Germany
  • Miguel Bruns, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Nick Logler, University of Washington, USA
  • Nick Taylor, Newcastle University, UK
  • Nikita Sharma, University of Twente, Netherlands
  • Seungwoo Je, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), China
  • Tag Alshehri, Monash University, Malaysia
  • Tomasz Jaskiewicz, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences & Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Xueliang Li, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), China
  • Yu-Ting Cheng, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan

AI and Design

Subcommittee Chairs

  • Q. Vera Liao, Microsoft Research
  • John Zimmerman, Carnegie Mellon University

Associate Chairs

  • Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, University of Southern California, Annenberg, USA
  • Antti Salovaara, Aalto University, Finland
  • Bryan Wang, University of Toronto
  • Céline Mougenot, Imperial College London, UK
  • Dae Hyun Kim, Yonsei University / KAIST, Korea
  • Divy Thakkar, Google, USA
  • Edith Law, University of Waterloo, Canada
  • Gonzalo Ramos, Microsoft Research, USA
  • Graham Dove, New York University, USA
  • Hajin Lim, Seoul National University, Korea
  • Jin Guo, McGill University, Canada
  • Jina Huh-Yoo, Stevens Institute of Technology, USA
  • Jodi Forlizzi, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Joongi Shin, Aalto University, Finland
  • Jung-Joo Lee, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Katy Gero, Harvard University, USA
  • Marco Gillies, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK
  • Michal Luria, Center for Democracy & Technology
  • Mingming Fan, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China
  • Motahhare Eslami, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Niels van Berkel, Aalborg University, Denmark
  • Nikolas Martelaro, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Nur Yildirim, University of Virginia, USA
  • Qiaosi Wang, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Savvas Petridis, Google DeepMind, USA
  • Sharifa Sultana, University of Illinois
  • Shuai Ma, Aalto University, Finland
  • Vikram Mohanty, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Wesley Deng, Carnegie Mellon University, USA